Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) · Facelift 2022 2.0 TurbovsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) · Facelift 2022

2.0 Turbo

280 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv G

284 hp3283 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo

Quickest 0-100 km/h
5.7 s
Fastest top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightest
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
Best power-to-weight
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Largest trunk
525 L
Best overall score
69/100
Best performance score
61/100
Best practicality score
85/100

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

Most powerful
284 hp
212 kW
Highest torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Lowest combined fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Best estimated range
784 km
487 mi
Best economy score
87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power	280hp209kW	284hp212kW
Torque	400Nm295lb-ft	450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight	1,680kg3,704lb	1,949kg4,297lb
Gross weight	2,350kg5,181lb	2,500kg5,512lb
Top speed	230 km/h 143 mph	219 km/h 136 mph
To 99% top speed	62.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated	72.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	5.7s	6.9s
0-200 km/h	24.4s Calculated	34.7s Calculated
0-60 mph	5.4s Calculated	6.5s Calculated
Fuel consumption	8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK	7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	-	9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	-	6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile	13.9s Calculated	15.0s Calculated
Power-to-weight	167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated	146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated	231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	719km447mi Calculated	784km487mi Calculated
Displacement	1,995cc122cu in	3,283cc200cu in
Length	4,687mm185in	4,745mm187in
Width	1,903mm75in	1,890mm74in
Height	1,693mm67in	1,688mm66in
Wheelbase	2,818mm111in	2,870mm113in
Front track	1,627mm64in	1,640mm65in
Rear track	1,674mm66in	1,645mm65in
Ground clearance	-	179mm7in
Trunk volume	525L	477L
Max trunk volume	1,600L	1,726L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	64L	58L
CO2 emissions	-	171g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 TurboMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	5,250 rpm	2,250 rpm	5,500 rpm
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	5,000-6,000 rpm	2,000-3,500 rpm	6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	5.4 s	6.5 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	5.7 s	6.9 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	24.4 s	34.7 s
Top speed	230 km/h 143 mph	219 km/h 136 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.3 s	2.4 s
330 ft 101 m	6.0 s	6.5 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.1 s	9.7 s
1000 ft 305 m	11.7 s	12.6 s
1/4 mile 402 m	13.9 s	15.0 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	164 km/h 102 mph	152 km/h 95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	280 hp 209 kW
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	284 hp 212 kW

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G has 4 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	400 Nm 295 lb-ft
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	450 Nm 332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	1,680 kg 3,704 lb
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	1,949 kg 4,297 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	230 km/h 143 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	219 km/h 136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	5.7 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	6.9 s

Although Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	719 km 447 mi
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	784 km 487 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	280 hp 209 kW	5.7 s	230 km/h 143 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	284 hp 212 kW	6.9 s	219 km/h 136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo

Power	280 hp 209 kW
0-100 km/h	5.7 s
Top speed 230 km/h 143 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	525 L 18.5 cu ft
Length	4,687 mm 184.5 in
Height	1,693 mm 66.7 in

MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G

Power	284 hp 212 kW
0-100 km/h	6.9 s
Top speed 219 km/h 136 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	477 L 16.8 cu ft
Length	4,745 mm 186.8 in
Height	1,688 mm 66.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo

Power	280 hp 209 kW
0-100 km/h	5.7 s
Top speed 230 km/h 143 mph

8.9 L/100 km

26.4 mpg US

31.7 mpg UK

MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G

Power	284 hp 212 kW
0-100 km/h	6.9 s
Top speed 219 km/h 136 mph

7.4 L/100 km

31.8 mpg US

38.2 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK	5.7 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK	6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo	167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp	8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G	146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp	7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo

MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G

Power

280 hp

209 kW

284 hp

212 kW

Torque

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

450 Nm

332 lb-ft

Acceleration

5.7 s

6.9 s

Top speed

230 km/h

143 mph

219 km/h

136 mph

Lightness

1,680 kg

3,704 lb

1,949 kg

4,297 lb

Fuel consumption

8.9 L/100 km

26.4 mpg US

31.7 mpg UK

7.4 L/100 km

31.8 mpg US

38.2 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	525 L 18.5 cu ft
Length	4,687 mm 184.5 in
Height	1,693 mm 66.7 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	477 L 16.8 cu ft
Length	4,745 mm 186.8 in
Height	1,688 mm 66.5 in

Range score

719 km

447 mi

784 km

487 mi

CO2 score

171 g/km

Trunk score

525 L

18.5 cu ft

477 L

16.8 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

167 hp/t

124 kW/t

6.0 kg/hp

146 hp/t

109 kW/t

6.9 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo	Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption	8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK	7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	15.58 LC100 km	12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	25.07 LC100 mi	20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal	1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,336 LC/year	1,943 LC/year