AUDI Q8 (4M)
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) · Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) · Facelift 2022
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,027 km638 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Gross weight | 2,890kg6,371lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.9s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 62.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.5s Calculated | 24.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,027km638mi Calculated | 719km447mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,627mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,674mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.5 s | 24.5 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 280 hp 209 kW |
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI has 6 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo and AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 6.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 5.7 s |
Although AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo and AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 1,027 km 638 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 719 km 447 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.1 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,027 km 638 mi | 719 km 447 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 308 km (192 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.0 Turbo
- Is 480 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























