Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0 GME
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions170 g/km
- Best estimated range1,031 km641 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,954kg4,308lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,570kg5,666lb | - |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 83.4s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 65.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,031km641mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,666mm66in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 170g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 280 hp 209 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME and Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 1,954 kg 4,308 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 6.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 5.7 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME and Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 1,031 km 641 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.4 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,954 kg 4,308 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,031 km 641 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 170 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 231 km (144 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 GME
- Is 294 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























