Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.0

200 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    525 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    137 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,058 km
    657 mi
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,872kg4,127lb
Gross weight-
2,390kg5,269lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
76.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
86.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
39.8s
Calculated
66.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
914km568mi
Calculated
1,058km657mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,687mm185in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,903mm75in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,671mm66in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,818mm111in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,613mm64in
-
Rear track
1,653mm65in
-
Ground clearance
200mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
525L
505L
Max trunk volume-
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
64L
55L
CO2 emissions
161g/km
137g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.04,500 rpm1,750 rpm4,750 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.8 s
66.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
200 hp
149 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 has 10 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,872 kg
4,127 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
215 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.07.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
914 km
568 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,058 km
657 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
200 hp
149 kW
7.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.4 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
8.4 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,872 kg
4,127 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,671 mm
65.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
914 km
568 mi
1,058 km
657 mi
CO2 score
161 g/km
137 g/km
Trunk score
525 L
18.5 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 212 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 143 km (89 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 24 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0
20i
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.0
20i
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0vsBMWX1 (F48)20i
2.0 D4
2.2d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster