Jaguar E-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions161 g/km
- Best estimated range914 km568 mi
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score88/100
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,757kg3,874lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.1s Calculated | 39.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 835km519mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in | 1,671mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,634mm64in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 1,234L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,577L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 186g/km | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 4,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.1 s | 39.8 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 1,757 kg 3,874 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 835 km 519 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,757 kg 3,874 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 835 km 519 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 186 g/km | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 709 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.0
- Is 97 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























