Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33)
Car comparison
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24VvsAlfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (916) · Facelift 2003
3.2 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful283 hp211 kW
- Highest torque352 Nm260 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight173 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score36/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Largest trunk147 L
- Best economy score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 283hp211kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 352Nm260lb-ft | 289Nm213lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 84.8s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 530km330mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 3,179cc194cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,815mm71in | 1,776mm70in |
| Height | 1,328mm52in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | 1,508mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 147L |
| Max trunk volume | 130L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V has 43 hp more than Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
Although Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V has more power, Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.3 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoSpider (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 283 hp 211 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 530 km 330 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 147 L 5.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Has 43 hp more
- Has 63 Nm more
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Spider (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























