Renault Megane III
Car comparison
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCevsAlfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo MiTo
1.4 TB MultiAir
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best estimated range779 km484 mi
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lightest1,145 kg2,524 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,145kg2,524lb |
| Gross weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 74.4s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.4s Calculated | 36.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 4,295mm169in | 4,063mm160in |
| Width | 1,808mm71in | 1,720mm68in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,446mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,641mm104in | 2,511mm99in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,483mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,475mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 270L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,162L | 950L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.4 s | 36.3 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 170 hp 127 kW |
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir and Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 1,145 kg 2,524 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 7.5 s |
Although Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe has more power, Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir and Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir and Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 779 km 484 mi |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.5 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,145 kg 2,524 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe | Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























