Mini Hatch (R56)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6vsAlfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo MiTo
1.4 TB MultiAir
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,145 kg2,524 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk270 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score63/100
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range781 km485 mi
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,155kg2,546lb | 1,145kg2,524lb |
| Gross weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 74.4s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 36.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 781km485mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,714mm146in | 4,063mm160in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,720mm68in |
| Height | 1,407mm55in | 1,446mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,467mm97in | 2,511mm99in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,483mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,475mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 270L |
| Max trunk volume | 680L | 950L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 36.3 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 has 14 hp more than Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir and Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,155 kg 2,546 lb |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 1,145 kg 2,524 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 and Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.5 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,155 kg 2,546 lb | 1,145 kg 2,524 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 781 km 485 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 | Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























