Car comparison

Peugeot 207 · Facelift 2009 RC 1.6vsAlfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Peugeot 207 · Facelift 2009

RC 1.6

174 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2009-2012
VS

Alfa Romeo MiTo

1.4 TB MultiAir

170 hp1368 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2009-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir

  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,145 kg
    2,524 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    750 km
    466 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Peugeot 207 Facelift 2009 RC 1.6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    174 hp
    130 kW
  • Largest trunk
    270 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    63/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPeugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
Power
174hp130kW
170hp127kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,240kg2,734lb
1,145kg2,524lb
Gross weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,705kg3,759lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
76.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
74.4s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
30.3s
Calculated
36.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
694km432mi
Calculated
750km466mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,368cc83cu in
Length
4,045mm159in
4,063mm160in
Width
1,748mm69in
1,720mm68in
Height
1,472mm58in
1,446mm57in
Wheelbase
2,540mm100in
2,511mm99in
Front track
1,475mm58in
1,483mm58in
Rear track
1,468mm58in
1,475mm58in
Trunk volume
270L
270L
Max trunk volume
923L
950L
Doors
3
3
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
45L
CO2 emissions
171g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Peugeot 207 Facelift 2009 RC 1.6Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAirPowerTorque
  • Peugeot 207 Facelift 2009 RC 1.6: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.66,000 rpm1,600-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir5,500 rpm2,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPeugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.3 s
36.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
174 hp
130 kW
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
170 hp
127 kW

Peugeot 207 Facelift 2009 RC 1.6 has 4 hp more than Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir and Peugeot 207 Facelift 2009 RC 1.6: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
1,145 kg
2,524 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.67.1 s
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir7.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 207 Facelift 2009 RC 1.6 and Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir and Peugeot 207 Facelift 2009 RC 1.6: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
694 km
432 mi
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
750 km
466 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
174 hp
130 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
170 hp
127 kW
7.5 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
Power
174 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,045 mm
159.3 in
Height
1,472 mm
58.0 in
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,063 mm
160.0 in
Height
1,446 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
Power
174 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Peugeot 207 Facelift 2009 RC 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.1 s
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePeugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
Power
174 hp
130 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
1,145 kg
2,524 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,045 mm
159.3 in
Height
1,472 mm
58.0 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,063 mm
160.0 in
Height
1,446 mm
56.9 in
Range score
694 km
432 mi
750 km
466 mi
CO2 score
171 g/km
-
Trunk score
270 L
9.5 cu ft
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePeugeot 207 Facelift 2009 RC 1.6Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Peugeot 207 Facelift 2009 RC 1.6

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 95 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Peugeot 207 RC 1.6
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RC 1.6
RC 1.6
VS
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6vsPeugeot207RC 1.6
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TP
VS
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
RC 1.6
1.6 RC
VS
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6vsPeugeot207 SW1.6 RC
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
RC 1.6
2.0 RC
VS
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6vsPeugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC
1.4 TB MultiAir
2.0 JTDM
VS
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM
RC 1.6
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6vsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
RC 1.6
Cooper S 1.6
VS
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
RC 1.6
A 200 Turbo
VS
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6vsMercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo
1.4 TB MultiAir
2.2 D-CAT
VS
Alfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAirvsToyotaAuris IFacelift 20102.2 D-CAT
RC 1.6
GTI 1.4 TSI
VS
Peugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6vsVolkswagenPolo V (5-DOOR)GTI 1.4 TSI
Peugeot 207 · Facelift 2009 RC 1.6 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir - car comparison - FastVsFaster