Alfa Romeo Junior
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2vsVolkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan III
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.1 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range849 km528 mi
- Best performance score40/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight93 hp/t70 kW/t10.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136hp101kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 1,965kg4,332lb | 2,140kg4,718lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 89.3s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.1s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 55.4s Calculated | 62.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.6s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 153Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 849km528mi Calculated | 724km450mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,199cc73cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,173mm164in | 4,539mm179in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,544mm61in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,557mm101in | 2,676mm105in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,582mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 191mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 340L | 652L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,205L | 1,650L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 55.4 s | 62.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.6 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 136 hp 101 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI has 14 hp more than Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 207 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 9.1 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 9.2 s |
Although Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI has more power, Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 93 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 849 km 528 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 724 km 450 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 136 hp 101 kW | 9.1 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.2 s | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | 93 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoJunior1.2 | VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp 101 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.1 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 849 km 528 mi | 724 km 450 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2 | Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Junior 1.2
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 125 km (78 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 312 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























