Car comparison

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6vsRenault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003

3.2 V6

240 hp3179 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2004
VS

Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II)

RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

230 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2006-2008

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

  • Highest torque
    310 Nm
    229 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,355 kg
    2,987 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    170 hp/t
    127 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.4 L/100 km
    20.6 mpg US
    24.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    330 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    56/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
240hp179kW
230hp172kW
Torque
289Nm213lb-ft
310Nm229lb-ft
Curb weight
1,445kg3,186lb
1,355kg2,987lb
Gross weight
1,855kg4,090lb
1,800kg3,968lb
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
85.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
81.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
23.6s
Calculated
28.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
530km330mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,179cc194cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,228mm166in
Width
1,776mm70in
1,777mm70in
Height
1,318mm52in
1,436mm57in
Wheelbase
2,540mm100in
2,617mm103in
Front track
1,530mm60in
1,517mm60in
Rear track
1,508mm59in
1,521mm60in
Trunk volume
155L
330L
Max trunk volume-
1,190L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
70L
60L
CO2 emissions-
199g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16VPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
  • Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V66,200 rpm4,800 rpm6,450 rpm
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.6 s
28.0 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
100 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
240 hp
179 kW
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
230 hp
172 kW

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 has 10 hp more than Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
289 Nm
213 lb-ft
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
310 Nm
229 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
1,355 kg
2,987 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
255 km/h
158 mph
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V66.3 s
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V6.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 4.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
530 km
330 mi
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
714 km
444 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
240 hp
179 kW
6.3 s
255 km/h
158 mph
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
230 hp
172 kW
6.5 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
155 L
5.5 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,318 mm
51.9 in
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,228 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
6.3 s
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
240 hp
179 kW
230 hp
172 kW
Torque
289 Nm
213 lb-ft
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
6.5 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
1,355 kg
2,987 lb
Fuel consumption
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
155 L
5.5 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,318 mm
51.9 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,228 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Range score
530 km
330 mi
714 km
444 mi
CO2 score
-
199 g/km
Trunk score
155 L
5.5 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.10 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.18 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,465 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

  • Has 21 Nm more
  • Is 90 kg lighter
  • Uses 4.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 184 km (114 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 175 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.2 V6
Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2 V6
3.0 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
3.2 V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
3.2 V6
330Ci
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6vsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6vsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe
3.2 V6
330Ci
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6vsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
3.2 V6
1.3 Wankel
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6vsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 vs Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster