Nissan 350Z (Z33)
Car comparison
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24VvsAlfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003
3.2 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful283 hp211 kW
- Highest torque352 Nm260 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t137 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.1 L/100 km14.6 mpg US17.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range614 km382 mi
- Largest trunk235 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score76/100
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Lightest1,445 kg3,186 lb
- Best practicality score41/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 283hp211kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 352Nm260lb-ft | 289Nm213lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,445kg3,186lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 85.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.8s Calculated | 23.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 614km382mi Calculated | 530km330mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 3,179cc194cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,776mm70in |
| Height | 1,316mm52in | 1,318mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,508mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 235L | 155L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.8 s | 23.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V has 43 hp more than Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 5.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 614 km 382 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 530 km 330 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 283 hp 211 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 614 km 382 mi | 530 km 330 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | 155 L 5.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V | Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Has 43 hp more
- Has 63 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 84 km (52 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Is 100 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























