Alfa Romeo GTV (916)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6vsVolvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Coupe
2.5 20V T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best performance score55/100
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk427 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 99.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 32.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 654km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 2,435cc149cu in |
| Length | 4,285mm169in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,320mm52in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | 427L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 32.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 193 hp 144 kW |
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 has 27 hp more than Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6.7 s |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 654 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T
- Has 5 Nm more
- Has 317 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























