Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDMvsVolvo V40 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Lightest1,385 kg3,053 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,277 km793 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk496 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,385kg3,053lb | 1,398kg3,082lb |
| Gross weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.8s Calculated | 44.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,277km793mi Calculated | 1,154km717mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,956cc119cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,351mm171in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,634mm104in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,554mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,554mm61in | 1,536mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 496L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.8 s | 44.9 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 170 hp 127 kW |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
Volvo V40 2.0 D4 has 7 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,398 kg 3,082 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 8.0 s |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 8.3 s |
Although Volvo V40 2.0 D4 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 1,277 km 793 mi |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,154 km 717 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.0 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM | VolvoV402.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | 1,398 kg 3,082 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,277 km 793 mi | 1,154 km 717 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM | Volvo V40 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 2.0 JTDM
- Is 13 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 123 km (76 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 146 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























