Volkswagen Phideon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Veloce 2.2 JTD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,106 km687 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 61.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 1,106km687mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 5,074mm200in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,489mm59in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,009mm118in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,625mm64in |
| Trunk volume | - | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 122g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 4,500-6,250 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 224 hp 167 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI has 14 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 8.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 6.8 s |
Although Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 1,106 km 687 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 224 hp 167 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 1,106 km 687 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 122 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 280 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























