Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Veloce 2.2 JTD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best estimated range1,106 km687 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 61.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.6s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 840km522mi Calculated | 1,106km687mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,625mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | 122g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.6 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 210 hp 157 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD has 10 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 840 km 522 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 1,106 km 687 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 840 km 522 mi | 1,106 km 687 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | 122 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 266 km (166 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 57 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























