Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 3.5vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Veloce 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best estimated range1,129 km702 mi
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score90/100
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,787kg3,940lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 49.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,129km702mi Calculated | 906km563mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,625mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 148g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 5,250 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 has 26 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 5.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 1,129 km 702 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 906 km 563 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,129 km 702 mi | 906 km 563 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 148 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5
- Has 26 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 223 km (138 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 257 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























