Car comparison

Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 3.5vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017

3.5

306 hp3498 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSedan2017-present
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    306 hp
    228 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,129 km
    702 mi
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,715 kg
    3,781 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    175 hp/t
    130 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelInfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
306hp228kW
300hp224kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,787kg3,940lb
1,715kg3,781lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
51.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
58.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.1s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
15.4s
Calculated
18.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.9s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
175hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,129km702mi
Calculated
1,028km639mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,498cc213cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,810mm189in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,960mm117in
Front track-
1,605mm63in
Rear track-
1,594mm63in
Trunk volume
400L
540L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
74L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
163g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.56,800 rpm5,000 rpm7,050 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricInfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.9 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.1 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.4 s
18.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
11.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
176 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
306 hp
228 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
300 hp
224 kW

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 has 6 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
1,787 kg
3,940 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,715 kg
3,781 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.55.1 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.05.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
1,129 km
702 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,028 km
639 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
306 hp
228 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
300 hp
224 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Length
4,810 mm
189.4 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.1 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleInfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
306 hp
228 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.1 s
5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,787 kg
3,940 lb
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Length
4,810 mm
189.4 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,129 km
702 mi
1,028 km
639 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
163 g/km
Trunk score
400 L
14.1 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleInfiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 19 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 72 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 140 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Infiniti Q50 3.5
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.5
740d
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsBMW7 Series (G11)740d
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
3.5
2.0 T6
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
2.0
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
3.5
3.0d V6
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
3.5
2.0
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
3.5
2.0 TFSI
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsAUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.5
3.0d V6
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
3.5
2.5
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5vsSubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 3.5 vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster