Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 3.5vsJaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
3.0d V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,750 kg3,858 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,200 km746 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,787kg3,940lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 64.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 19.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,129km702mi Calculated | 1,200km746mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 has 6 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 5.1 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 1,129 km 702 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 1,200 km 746 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20173.5 | JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,129 km 702 mi | 1,200 km 746 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5 | Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 3.5
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
- Has 350 Nm more
- Is 37 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























