Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbovsCadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

Cadillac ATS Sedan

V 3.6 V6

471 hp3564 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboSedan2016-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    307 km/h
    191 mph
  • Most powerful
    510 hp
    380 kW
  • Lightest
    1,620 kg
    3,571 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    315 hp/t
    235 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.9 L/100 km
    19.8 mpg US
    23.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    630 km
    392 mi
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    70/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurboCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
510hp380kW
471hp351kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
603Nm445lb-ft
Curb weight
1,620kg3,571lb
1,729kg3,812lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
-
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
298 km/h
185 mph
To 99% top speed
39.1s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph
Calculated
44.7s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
4.2s
0-200 km/h
9.8s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
4.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
11.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
315hp/t235kW/t143hp/1000 lb
Calculated
272hp/t203kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
370Nm/t248lb-ft/ton
Calculated
349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
630km392mi
Calculated
488km303mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,891cc176cu in
3,564cc217cu in
Length
4,639mm183in
4,673mm184in
Width
1,874mm74in
1,811mm71in
Height
1,433mm56in
1,415mm56in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,775mm109in
Front track
1,555mm61in
1,538mm61in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,536mm60in
Trunk volume
480L
295L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
58L
61L
CO2 emissions
214g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurboCadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo6,500 rpm2,500 rpm6,750 rpm
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V65,850 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurboCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
4.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
4.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.8 s
11.2 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
298 km/h
185 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
10.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
11.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
218 km/h
135 mph
207 km/h
129 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
510 hp
380 kW
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo has 39 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo: 39 hp (29 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
603 Nm
445 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
1,729 kg
3,812 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
307 km/h
191 mph
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
298 km/h
185 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo3.9 s
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V64.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo and Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo and Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
315 hp/t
235 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
630 km
392 mi
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
488 km
303 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
510 hp
380 kW
3.9 s
307 km/h
191 mph
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
4.2 s
298 km/h
185 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,639 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,433 mm
56.4 in
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
3.9 s
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
4.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
315 hp/t
235 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurboCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
510 hp
380 kW
471 hp
351 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.9 s
4.2 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
298 km/h
185 mph
Lightness
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
1,729 kg
3,812 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,639 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,433 mm
56.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Range score
630 km
392 mi
488 km
303 mi
CO2 score
214 g/km
-
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
315 hp/t
235 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurboCadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km21.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi34.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year3,255 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo

  • Has 39 hp more
  • Is 109 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 143 km (89 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 185 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Has 3 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbovsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
V 3.6 V6
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbovsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
V 3.6 V6
CS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsBMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
Performance 80.5 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbovsTeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh
V 3.6 V6
F 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
Competition 3.0
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbovsBMWM3 (G80)Competition 3.0
V 3.6 V6
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbovsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 2017Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
V 3.6 V6
AMG C 63 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
750i
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbovsBMW7 Series (G11 LCI)Facelift 2019750i
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
Performance 80.5 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbovsTeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo vs Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster