Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbovsTesla Model 3 · Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model 3 · Facelift 2020
Performance 80.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.3 s
- Most powerful513 hp383 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Largest trunk649 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
- Fastest top speed307 km/h191 mph
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight315 hp/t235 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 513hp383kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,928kg4,251lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,301kg5,073lb |
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 39.1s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph Calculated | 27.9s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.8s Calculated | 9.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 315hp/t235kW/t143hp/1000 lb Calculated | 266hp/t198kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 370Nm/t248lb-ft/ton Calculated | 342Nm/t229lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km392mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,891cc176cu in | - |
| Length | 4,639mm183in | 4,694mm185in |
| Width | 1,874mm74in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 649L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.8 s | 9.4 s |
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 10.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo | 510 hp 380 kW |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 513 hp 383 kW |
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh has 3 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo and Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 261 km/h 162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo | 3.9 s |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 3.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.9 s | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 513 hp 383 kW | 3.3 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 513 hp 383 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 392 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 649 L 22.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 BiTurbo
- Is 308 kg lighter
- Has 46 km/h (29 mph) higher top speed
- Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 169 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























