Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed307 km/h191 mph
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight323 hp/t241 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions198 g/km
- Best estimated range682 km424 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score84/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Highest torque610 Nm450 lb-ft
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 610Nm450lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 38.5s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph Calculated | 40.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.8s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 323hp/t241kW/t146hp/1000 lb Calculated | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 550km342mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,891cc176cu in | 6,208cc379cu in |
| Length | 4,639mm183in | - |
| Width | 1,873mm74in | - |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | - |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 198g/km | 280g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.8 s | 10.9 s |
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 136 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 682 km 424 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.9 s | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 550 km 342 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 198 g/km | 280 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 132 km (82 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 82 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Has 10 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























