Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6vsBMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

510 hp2891 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboSedan2016-2018

BMW M3 (F80)

CS 3.0

460 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2018-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

Quickest 0-100 km/h
3.9 s
Fastest top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Most powerful
510 hp
380 kW
Highest torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Lightest
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
Best power-to-weight
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Lowest highway consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Largest trunk
480 L
Best overall score
83/100
Best performance score
89/100

BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0

Lowest combined fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
194 g/km
Best estimated range
723 km
449 mi
Best economy score
85/100
Best practicality score
73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0
Power	510hp380kW	460hp343kW
Torque	600Nm443lb-ft	600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight	1,580kg3,483lb	1,585kg3,494lb
Gross weight	-	2,100kg4,630lb
Top speed	307 km/h 191 mph	Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	38.5s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph Calculated	41.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	3.9s	3.9s
0-200 km/h	9.8s Calculated	10.7s Calculated
0-60 mph	3.8s Calculated	3.7s Calculated
Fuel consumption	8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK	8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK	11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK	6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile	11.4s Calculated	11.6s Calculated
Power-to-weight	323hp/t241kW/t146hp/1000 lb Calculated	290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated	379Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	682km424mi Calculated	723km449mi Calculated
Displacement	2,891cc176cu in	2,979cc182cu in
Length	4,639mm183in	4,671mm184in
Width	1,873mm74in	1,877mm74in
Height	1,426mm56in	1,424mm56in
Wheelbase	2,820mm111in	2,812mm111in
Front track	1,555mm61in	1,579mm62in
Rear track	1,607mm63in	1,604mm63in
Ground clearance	-	119mm5in
Trunk volume	480L	445L
Doors	4	4
Seats	4	5
Fuel tank	58L	60L
CO2 emissions	198g/km	194g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	6,500 rpm	2,500 rpm	6,750 rpm
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	6,250 rpm	4,000-5,380 rpm	6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	3.8 s	3.7 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	3.9 s	3.9 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	9.8 s	10.7 s
Top speed	307 km/h 191 mph	Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.2 s	2.1 s
330 ft 101 m	5.3 s	5.3 s
1/8 mile 201 m	7.7 s	7.7 s
1000 ft 305 m	9.7 s	9.8 s
1/4 mile 402 m	11.4 s	11.6 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	218 km/h 136 mph	209 km/h 130 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	510 hp 380 kW
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	460 hp 343 kW

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 has 50 hp more than BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6: 50 hp (37 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	600 Nm 443 lb-ft
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	600 Nm 443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	1,580 kg 3,483 lb
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	1,585 kg 3,494 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	307 km/h 191 mph
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	3.9 s
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	3.9 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	682 km 424 mi
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	723 km 449 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	510 hp 380 kW	3.9 s	307 km/h 191 mph
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	460 hp 343 kW	3.9 s	Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

Power	510 hp 380 kW
0-100 km/h	3.9 s
Top speed 307 km/h 191 mph

Doors/seats	4 doors 4 seats
Trunk	480 L 17.0 cu ft
Length	4,639 mm 182.6 in
Height	1,426 mm 56.1 in

BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0

Power	460 hp 343 kW
0-100 km/h	3.9 s
Top speed Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph

Doors/seats	4 doors 5 seats
Trunk	445 L 15.7 cu ft
Length	4,671 mm 183.9 in
Height	1,424 mm 56.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

Power	510 hp 380 kW
0-100 km/h	3.9 s
Top speed 307 km/h 191 mph

8.5 L/100 km

27.7 mpg US

33.2 mpg UK

BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0

Power	460 hp 343 kW
0-100 km/h	3.9 s
Top speed Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph

8.3 L/100 km

28.3 mpg US

34.0 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK	3.9 s
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK	3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp	8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK
BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0	290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp	8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0

Power

510 hp

380 kW

460 hp

343 kW

Torque

600 Nm

443 lb-ft

600 Nm

443 lb-ft

Acceleration

3.9 s

Top speed

307 km/h

191 mph

Unrestricted

290 km/h180 mph

Restricted

280 km/h174 mph

Lightness

1,580 kg

3,483 lb

1,585 kg

3,494 lb

Fuel consumption

8.5 L/100 km

27.7 mpg US

33.2 mpg UK

8.3 L/100 km

28.3 mpg US

34.0 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	4 doors 4 seats
Trunk	480 L 17.0 cu ft
Length	4,639 mm 182.6 in
Height	1,426 mm 56.1 in

Doors/seats	4 doors 5 seats
Trunk	445 L 15.7 cu ft
Length	4,671 mm 183.9 in
Height	1,424 mm 56.1 in

Range score

682 km

424 mi

723 km

449 mi

CO2 score

198 g/km

194 g/km

Trunk score

480 L

17.0 cu ft

445 L

15.7 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

323 hp/t

241 kW/t

3.1 kg/hp

290 hp/t

216 kW/t

3.4 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6	BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0
Consumption	8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK	8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	14.88 LC100 km	14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	23.94 LC100 mi	23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal	1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,231 LC/year	2,179 LC/year