Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 D180vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.2 MultiJet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions131 g/km
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t83 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,077 km669 mi
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 70.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 35.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,077km669mi Calculated | 1,040km646mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,678mm184in | 4,650mm183in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,641mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 138g/km | 131g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 35.2 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 160 hp 119 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 8.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 8.2 s |
Although Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,077 km 669 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 1,040 km 646 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,077 km 669 mi | 1,040 km 646 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 138 g/km | 131 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 MultiJet
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























