Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203) CLC 350 V6vsAlfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Brera
3.2 JTS V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203) CLC 350 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range620 km385 mi
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,065kg4,553lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 88.2s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.7s Calculated | 27.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 620km385mi Calculated | 614km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,448mm175in | 4,413mm174in |
| Width | 1,728mm68in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,341mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,476mm58in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,100L | 610L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 270g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203) CLC 350 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.7 s | 27.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203) CLC 350 V6 has 12 hp more than Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203) CLC 350 V6: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203) CLC 350 V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203) CLC 350 V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 620 km 385 mi |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 614 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.8 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203) CLC 350 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6 | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 620 km 385 mi | 614 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 270 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203) CLC 350 V6 | Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLC (CL203) CLC 350 V6
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 28 Nm more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 6 km (4 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























