Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2010-2015
VS

Alfa Romeo Brera

2.4 JTDM

210 hp2387 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2008-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,029 km
    640 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    51/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Lightest
    1,563 kg
    3,446 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    165 g/km

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIAlfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
Power
210hp157kW
210hp157kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,563kg3,446lb
1,575kg3,472lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
2,035kg4,486lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
101.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
96.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
33.5s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
775km481mi
Calculated
1,029km640mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,387cc146cu in
Length
4,423mm174in
4,410mm174in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,830mm72in
Height
1,444mm57in
1,341mm53in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,528mm100in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,547mm61in
1,559mm61in
Trunk volume
205L
300L
Max trunk volume-
610L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDMPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIAlfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.5 s
35.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
210 hp
157 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
1,563 kg
3,446 lb
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
1,575 kg
3,472 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI7.8 s
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM7.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
775 km
481 mi
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
1,029 km
640 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
238 km/h
148 mph
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
210 hp
157 kW
7.9 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,341 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.8 s
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIAlfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
Power
210 hp
157 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,563 kg
3,446 lb
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,341 mm
52.8 in
Range score
775 km
481 mi
1,029 km
640 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
179 g/km
Trunk score
205 L
7.2 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Is 12 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 255 km (158 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 95 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
2.4 JTDM
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI
2.4 JTDM
3.0 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TDI V6
2.4 JTDM
2.5 i 20V T5
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsVolvoC302.5 i 20V T5
2.0 TSI
E 250 CDI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
2.0 TSI
1.6 THP
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
2.4 JTDM
2.0 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
2.4 JTDM
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI vs Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM - car comparison - FastVsFaster