Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsAlfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 164 (164)
3.0 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Lowest city consumption13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 284Nm209lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 1,935kg4,266lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 73.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 26.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 2,959cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | 4,550mm179in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,490mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 26.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 230 hp 172 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 50 hp more than Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 284 Nm 209 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 152 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.7 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 284 Nm 209 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 101 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























