Alfa Romeo 164 (164)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24VvsLancia Thema (834) 8.32
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLancia Thema (834)
8.32
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque284 Nm209 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range745 km463 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Lancia Thema (834) 8.32
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | LanciaThema (834)8.32 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 284Nm209lb-ft | 284Nm209lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 1,935kg4,266lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 65.1s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.0s Calculated | 26.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 745km463mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 2,927cc179cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,590mm181in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | 1,435mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,480mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,490mm59in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,000L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Lancia Thema (834) 8.32: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 6,750 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | LanciaThema (834)8.32 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.0 s | 26.3 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 230 hp 172 kW |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V has 15 hp more than Lancia Thema (834) 8.32.
The biggest power difference is between Lancia Thema (834) 8.32 and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 284 Nm 209 lb-ft |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 284 Nm 209 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 7.7 s |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 7.2 s |
Although Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V has more power, Lancia Thema (834) 8.32 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lancia Thema (834) 8.32 and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V and Lancia Thema (834) 8.32: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 152 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 745 km 463 mi |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.7 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.2 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | 152 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| LanciaThema (834)8.32 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 i V6 24V | LanciaThema (834)8.32 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 284 Nm 209 lb-ft | 284 Nm 209 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 745 km 463 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V | Lancia Thema (834) 8.32 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 78 km (48 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lancia Thema (834) 8.32
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























