Renault Laguna II Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GTvsAlfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon
2.4 JTDM 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 33.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,014km630mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,387cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,695mm185in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,422mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,235L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 33.4 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V has 6 hp more than Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 8.2 s |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 8.3 s |
Although Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V has more power, Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.3 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,014 km 630 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























