Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20VvsJaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-Type Estate
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score88/100
Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 196hp146kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 241Nm178lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.4s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,387cc146cu in | 2,495cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,415L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.4 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 196 hp 146 kW |
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V has 14 hp more than Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 8.3 s |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V and Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.3 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 196 hp 146 kW | 8.5 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 196 hp 146 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 159 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
- Is 25 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























