Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6vsRenault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 147 GTA

3.2 V6

250 hp3179 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2003-2006
VS

Renault Megane II

RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

224 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2004-2005

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    209 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    682 km
    424 mi
  • Largest trunk
    330 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    72/100

Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    246 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    184 hp/t
    137 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    58/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
250hp186kW
224hp167kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,375kg3,031lb
Gross weight
1,880kg4,145lb
1,820kg4,012lb
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
71.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
72.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
23.2s
Calculated
26.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
521km324mi
Calculated
682km424mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,179cc194cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,213mm166in
4,228mm166in
Width
1,764mm69in
-
Height
1,412mm56in
1,436mm57in
Wheelbase
2,546mm100in
2,617mm103in
Front track
1,516mm60in
1,517mm60in
Rear track
1,504mm59in
1,521mm60in
Trunk volume
280L
330L
Max trunk volume
1,030L
1,190L
Doors
3
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
60L
CO2 emissions
287g/km
209g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16VPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
  • Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V66,200 rpm4,800 rpm6,450 rpm
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.2 s
26.2 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
102 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
224 hp
167 kW

Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 has 26 hp more than Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
1,375 kg
3,031 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
246 km/h
153 mph
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V66.3 s
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V6.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 and Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
521 km
324 mi
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
682 km
424 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
6.3 s
246 km/h
153 mph
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
224 hp
167 kW
6.5 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
4,213 mm
165.9 in
Height
1,412 mm
55.6 in
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,228 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
6.3 s
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
224 hp
167 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
6.5 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,375 kg
3,031 lb
Fuel consumption
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
4,213 mm
165.9 in
Height
1,412 mm
55.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,228 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Range score
521 km
324 mi
682 km
424 mi
CO2 score
287 g/km
209 g/km
Trunk score
280 L
9.9 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.18 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.08 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,176 LC/year2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6

  • Has 26 hp more
  • Is 15 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

  • Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 50 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 78 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2 V6
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsAUDIA3 (8P)3.2 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
3.2 V6
3.0i V6 24V
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsAUDIA3 Sportback (8PA)3.2i V6 24V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
3.2 V6
1.750 TBi
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
3.2 V6
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsAUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe
3.2 V6
R32 3.2 V6
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsVolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 vs Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster