AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2005 3.2 V6vsAlfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 147 GTA
3.2 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 3.2 V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions250 g/km
- Best estimated range571 km355 mi
- Largest trunk281 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score64/100
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t137 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 71.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.9s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 167hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 571km355mi Calculated | 521km324mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,189cc195cu in | 3,179cc194cu in |
| Length | 4,214mm166in | 4,213mm166in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,412mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,546mm100in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,516mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,507mm59in | 1,504mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 281L | 280L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,011L | 1,030L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 250g/km | 287g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 2,500-3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.9 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 6.5 s |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 3.2 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 167 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 571 km 355 mi |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 521 km 324 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.3 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 3.2 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | 167 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 571 km 355 mi | 521 km 324 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 250 g/km | 287 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 167 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 3.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 3.2 V6
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 51 km (32 mi) more estimated range
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
- Emits 37 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























