Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6vsAcura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura RSX
2.0 i 16V Type S
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Most powerful212 hp158 kW
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk504 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque285 Nm210 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 207hp154kW | 212hp158kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 194Nm143lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,485kg3,274lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | - |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 64.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 148Nm/t99lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 700km435mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,615mm182in | 4,374mm172in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,725mm68in |
| Height | 1,352mm53in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,486mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,486mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 504L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 238g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 7,800 rpm | 7,000 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 207 hp 154 kW |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW |
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S has 5 hp more than Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 and Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 7.8 s |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S and Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 207 hp 154 kW | 7.8 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW | 6.2 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 207 hp 154 kW | 212 hp 158 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 700 km 435 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 238 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
- Has 91 Nm more
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 114 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























