AUDI TT Coupe (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSIvsAcura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura RSX
2.0 i 16V Type S
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,260 kg2,778 lb
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score86/100
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Most powerful212 hp158 kW
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk504 L
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 212hp158kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 194Nm143lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,260kg2,778lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | - |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 64.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 148Nm/t99lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,178mm164in | 4,374mm172in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,725mm68in |
| Height | 1,352mm53in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,486mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,486mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 290L | 504L |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 7,800 rpm | 7,000 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW |
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S has 12 hp more than AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.6 s |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW | 6.2 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 212 hp 158 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 86 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Has 12 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 214 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























