AC Aceca III
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)
460 hp3506 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1998-2000
Car comparison
AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo · Stage 2vsAC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo · Stage 3vsAC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo · Stage 1vsAC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
AC Aceca III
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)
531 hp3506 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1998-2000
VS
AC Aceca III
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)
418 hp3506 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1998-2000
VS
AC Aceca III
3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
354 hp3506 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1998-2000
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2) 460 hp
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Lowest city consumption20.0 L/100 km11.8 mpg US14.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score58/100
AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3) 531 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Most powerful531 hp396 kW
- Highest torque631 Nm465 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight329 hp/t245 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460hp343kW+106 hp | 531hp396kW+177 hp | 418hp311kW+64 hp | 354hp264kW |
| Torque | 549Nm405lb-ft+142 Nm | 631Nm465lb-ft+224 Nm | 497Nm366lb-ft+90 Nm | 407Nm300lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.6s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph-7.6 s Calculated | 58.2s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph-18.0 s Calculated | 67.8s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph-8.4 s Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s-0.8 s | 4.4s-1.3 s | 5.1s-0.5 s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.5s-5.0 s Calculated | 13.0s-6.5 s Calculated | 16.6s-2.9 s Calculated | 19.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s-0.8 s Calculated | 4.2s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.8s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s-1.0 s Calculated | 12.2s-1.4 s Calculated | 13.1s-0.6 s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 285hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 329hp/t245kW/t149hp/1000 lb Calculated | 259hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 340Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated | 391Nm/t261lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,506cc214cu in | 3,506cc214cu in | 3,506cc214cu in | 3,506cc214cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,660mm183in | 4,660mm183in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,890mm74in | 1,890mm74in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,340mm53in | 1,340mm53in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,720mm107in | 2,720mm107in | 2,720mm107in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,590mm63in | 1,590mm63in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,570mm62in | 1,570mm62in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 500L | 500L | 500L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2) 460 hpAC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3) 531 hpAC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1) 418 hpAC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo 354 hpPowerTorque
- AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2) 460 hp: Power / Torque
- AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3) 531 hp: Power / Torque
- AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1) 418 hp: Power / Torque
- AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo 354 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.2 s | 4.8 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.4 s | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.5 s | 13.0 s | 16.6 s | 19.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.5 s | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.1 s | 8.6 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.4 s | 11.1 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.2 s | 13.1 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | 460 hp 343 kW |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | 531 hp 396 kW |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | 418 hp 311 kW |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp | 354 hp 264 kW |
AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3) 531 hp has 177 hp more than AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo 354 hp.
The biggest power difference is between AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo 354 hp and AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3) 531 hp: 177 hp (132 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | 549 Nm 405 lb-ft |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | 631 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | 497 Nm 366 lb-ft |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | 4.8 s |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | 4.4 s |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | 5.1 s |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp | 5.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3) 531 hp and AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo 354 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2) 460 hp and AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1) 418 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | 329 hp/t 245 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | 531 hp 396 kW | 4.4 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | 418 hp 311 kW | 5.1 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2)460 hp | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3)531 hp | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 1)418 hp | ACAceca III3.5 i V8 32V Turbo354 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp 343 kW | 531 hp 396 kW | 418 hp 311 kW | 354 hp 264 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 549 Nm 405 lb-ft | 631 Nm 465 lb-ft | 497 Nm 366 lb-ft | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.4 s | 5.1 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 329 hp/t 245 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 2) 460 hp
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (Stage 3) 531 hp
- Has 71 hp more
- Has 81 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AC Aceca III 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12