AC Ace
4.6 i V8 32V
326 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1997-2000
Car comparison
AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32VvsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Highest torque472 Nm348 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk215 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score42/100
AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight216 hp/t161 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326hp243kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 427Nm315lb-ft | 472Nm348lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s Calculated | 21.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 538km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,420mm174in | 4,914mm193in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 215L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 278g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32VChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8PowerTorque
- AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 5,800 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 21.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V has 16 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 5.7 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5.5 s |
Although AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V has more power, Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp 243 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 538 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 278 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 45 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
ACAce4.6 i V8 32VvsBMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
ACAce4.6 i V8 32VvsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
ACAce4.6 i V8 32VvsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
ACAce4.6 i V8 32VvsBMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI2.0
ACAce4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500
ACAce4.6 i V8 32VvsAston MartinVirage Volante5.3
ACAce4.6 i V8 32VvsCadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V