AC Ace
Car comparison
AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32VvsMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999
AMG CLK 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score48/100
AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight216 hp/t161 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.1 L/100 km15.6 mpg US18.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326hp243kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 427Nm315lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s Calculated | 21.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 530km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,420mm174in | 4,567mm180in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,722mm68in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,380mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,505mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,488mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 5,800 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 21.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 has 21 hp more than AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 5.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 6.2 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 has more power, AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ACAce4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp 243 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 530 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AC Ace 4.6 i V8 32V
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 83 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























