Renault Clio III (PHASE I)
Car comparison
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16VvsAbarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth Grande Punto (199)
Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk288 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score59/100
Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lightest1,185 kg2,612 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 215Nm159lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,240kg2,734lb | 1,185kg2,612lb |
| Gross weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.8s Calculated | 38.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 618km384mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,991mm157in | 4,041mm159in |
| Width | 1,768mm70in | 1,721mm68in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,585mm102in | 2,510mm99in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,476mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,465mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 288L | 275L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,028L | 1,030L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
- Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 7,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 5,750 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.8 s | 38.9 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 200 hp 149 kW |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 180 hp 134 kW |
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V has 20 hp more than Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 6.9 s |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.5 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 618 km 384 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 288 L 10.2 cu ft | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 13 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 55 kg lighter
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























