Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 D5 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC90 II
2.0 D5 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC90 II
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful349 hp260 kW
- Highest torque752 Nm555 lb-ft
- Lightest2,078 kg4,581 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions152 g/km
- Best estimated range1,224 km761 mi
- Largest trunk368 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 349hp260kW+124 hp | 304hp227kW+79 hp | 270hp201kW+45 hp | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 752Nm555lb-ft+282 Nm | 658Nm485lb-ft+188 Nm | 588Nm433lb-ft+118 Nm | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,078kg4,581lb | 2,078kg4,581lb | 2,078kg4,581lb | 2,078kg4,581lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-17.8 s Calculated | 85.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph-11.8 s Calculated | 90.3s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph-7.1 s Calculated | 97.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s-1.9 s | 6.5s-1.3 s | 7.0s-0.8 s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s-20.2 s Calculated | 27.5s-15.8 s Calculated | 32.2s-11.0 s Calculated | 43.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s-1.7 s Calculated | 6.1s-1.2 s Calculated | 6.6s-0.8 s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s-1.6 s Calculated | 14.6s-1.1 s Calculated | 15.0s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,224km761mi Calculated | 1,224km761mi Calculated | 1,224km761mi Calculated | 1,224km761mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | 1,676mm66in | 1,676mm66in | 1,676mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,679mm66in | 1,679mm66in | 1,679mm66in | 1,679mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | 238mm9in | 238mm9in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 368L | 368L | 368L | 368L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | 1,886L | 1,886L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 71L | 71L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | 152g/km | 152g/km | 152g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 304 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 1) 270 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 225 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | 7.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 27.5 s | 32.2 s | 43.2 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.2 s | 12.6 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.6 s | 15.0 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 349 hp 260 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 304 hp 227 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 270 hp 201 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 225 hp 168 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp has 124 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 225 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 225 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp: 124 hp (92 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 752 Nm 555 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 658 Nm 485 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 588 Nm 433 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 7.0 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 225 hp: 1.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 304 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 1) 270 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 1,224 km 761 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 1,224 km 761 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 1,224 km 761 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 1,224 km 761 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 349 hp 260 kW | 5.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 304 hp 227 kW | 6.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 270 hp 201 kW | 7.0 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5225 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 349 hp 260 kW | 304 hp 227 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 752 Nm 555 lb-ft | 658 Nm 485 lb-ft | 588 Nm 433 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | 7.0 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,224 km 761 mi | 1,224 km 761 mi | 1,224 km 761 mi | 1,224 km 761 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | 152 g/km | 152 g/km | 152 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 304 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 1) 270 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 225 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 94 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 304 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























