Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5vsLexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 D5

225 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2015-2016
VS

Lexus NX I (AZ10)

200t

238 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    152 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,224 km
    761 mi
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Most powerful
    238 hp
    177 kW
  • Lightest
    1,810 kg
    3,990 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    555 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
225hp168kW
238hp177kW
Torque
470Nm347lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,078kg4,581lb
1,810kg3,990lb
Gross weight
2,750kg6,063lb
2,350kg5,181lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
97.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
72.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
43.2s
Calculated
44.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,224km761mi
Calculated
759km472mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
4,630mm182in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,845mm73in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,645mm65in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,676mm66in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,679mm66in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
185mm7in
Trunk volume
368L
555L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
1,600L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
60L
CO2 emissions
152g/km
183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200tPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
  • Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D54,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t4,800 rpm1,650 rpm5,700 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.2 s
44.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
238 hp
177 kW

Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t has 13 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2,078 kg
4,581 lb
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
1,810 kg
3,990 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D57.8 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t7.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
1,224 km
761 mi
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
759 km
472 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW
7.8 s
220 km/h
137 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
238 hp
177 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Length
4,630 mm
182.3 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.8 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
225 hp
168 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
2,078 kg
4,581 lb
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Length
4,630 mm
182.3 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in
Range score
1,224 km
761 mi
759 km
472 mi
CO2 score
152 g/km
183 g/km
Trunk score
368 L
13.0 cu ft
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 465 km (289 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 31 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Is 268 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 187 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
200t
300
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
200t
350h
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 D5
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC402.0 D4
200t
450d V8
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8
2.0 D5
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
200t
2.0
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 D5
JCW 1.6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014JCW 1.6
200t
2.0d
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0 D5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
200t
Sport 2.0 T
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 vs Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t - car comparison - FastVsFaster