Volvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5vsVolvo V90 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,321 km821 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Lightest1,906 kg4,202 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 215hp160kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,919kg4,231lb | 1,906kg4,202lb |
| Gross weight | 2,390kg5,269lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.1s Calculated | 40.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,321km821mi Calculated | 1,122km697mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,838mm190in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,604mm63in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,815mm111in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,614mm64in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 575L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.1 s | 40.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 25 hp more than Volvo V90 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D4 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,906 kg 4,202 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 8.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,321 km 821 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,122 km 697 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | VolvoV902.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 215 hp 160 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb | 1,906 kg 4,202 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,321 km 821 mi | 1,122 km 697 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Is 13 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























