Volvo V50
Car comparison
Volvo V50 2.5 T5vsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range1,321 km821 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,919kg4,231lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.3s Calculated | 38.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | 1,321km821mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,514mm178in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 243g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.3 s | 38.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo V50 2.5 T5 has 5 hp more than Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 4.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 569 km 353 mi |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,321 km 821 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | 1,321 km 821 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 243 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 2.5 T5 | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 424 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 4.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 752 km (467 mi) more estimated range
- Has 158 L more trunk volume
- Emits 104 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























