Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016 2.0 T4vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range1,058 km657 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,568 kg3,457 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,568kg3,457lb | 1,872kg4,127lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 86.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.8s Calculated | 67.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 891km553mi Calculated | 1,058km657mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.8 s | 67.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 1,568 kg 3,457 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 891 km 553 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,058 km 657 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,568 kg 3,457 lb | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 891 km 553 mi | 1,058 km 657 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4
- Is 304 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 167 km (104 mi) more estimated range
- Has 181 L more trunk volume
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























