Volvo V40 Cross Country
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,578 kg3,479 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions117 g/km
- Best estimated range1,364 km847 mi
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,578kg3,479lb | 1,846kg4,070lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 90.6s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 57.1s Calculated | 69.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,364km847mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 117g/km | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 57.1 s | 69.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 13 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 1,578 kg 3,479 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 8.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.8 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has more power, Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 1,364 km 847 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,578 kg 3,479 lb | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,364 km 847 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 117 g/km | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
- Is 268 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 285 km (177 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 18 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























