Volvo V40 Cross Country
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Lightest1,476 kg3,254 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range1,127 km700 mi
- Best performance score46/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,476kg3,254lb | 1,872kg4,127lb |
| Gross weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 86.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.3s Calculated | 67.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,127km700mi Calculated | 1,058km657mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,596cc97cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.3 s | 67.0 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 1,476 kg 3,254 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 7.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.4 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has more power, Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 1,127 km 700 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,058 km 657 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.7 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,476 kg 3,254 lb | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,127 km 700 mi | 1,058 km 657 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4
- Is 396 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 km (43 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























