Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016 1.5 T3vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t76 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 1.5 T3
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,498 kg3,303 lb
- Lowest CO2 emissions131 g/km
- Best estimated range1,107 km688 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 152hp113kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,498kg3,303lb | 1,872kg4,127lb |
| Gross weight | 1,975kg4,354lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 86.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.6s Calculated | 67.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,107km688mi Calculated | 1,058km657mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 131g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.6 s | 67.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 38 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 1.5 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 1.5 T3 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 1,498 kg 3,303 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 8.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 1.5 T3: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 1,107 km 688 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,058 km 657 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20161.5 T3 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 152 hp 113 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,498 kg 3,303 lb | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,107 km 688 mi | 1,058 km 657 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 131 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 1.5 T3 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 1.5 T3
- Is 374 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 49 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 181 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























