Volvo V40 Cross Country
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5vsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,503 kg3,314 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,476 km917 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,631kg3,596lb | 1,503kg3,314lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 687km427mi Calculated | 1,476km917mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,497cc152cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 5,400 rpm | 1,800-4,200 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5 has 64 hp more than Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5: 64 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 6.4 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5 and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5: 4.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 687 km 427 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,476 km 917 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.5 T5 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 687 km 427 mi | 1,476 km 917 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5 | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.5 T5
- Has 64 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 128 kg lighter
- Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 789 km (491 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 85 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























