Volvo V40
Car comparison
Volvo V40 2.5 T5vsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,503 kg3,314 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,476 km917 mi
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best economy score95/100
Volvo V40 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV402.5 T5 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,574kg3,470lb | 1,503kg3,314lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.4s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 785km488mi Calculated | 1,476km917mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,497cc152cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,420mm56in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 133mm5in | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 185g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 5,400 rpm | 1,800-4,200 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV402.5 T5 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.4 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo V40 2.5 T5 has 64 hp more than Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 2.5 T5: 64 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 1,574 kg 3,470 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 6.1 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 2.5 T5 and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 2.5 T5: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 785 km 488 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,476 km 917 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV402.5 T5 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,574 kg 3,470 lb | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 785 km 488 mi | 1,476 km 917 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 185 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 2.5 T5 | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 2.5 T5
- Has 64 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 71 kg lighter
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 691 km (430 mi) more estimated range
- Has 11 L more trunk volume
- Emits 76 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























