Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D3vsVolvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions104 g/km
- Best estimated range1,550 km963 mi
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best economy score96/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,578kg3,479lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 93.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.3s Calculated | 56.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,550km963mi Calculated | 1,364km847mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,439mm57in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 104g/km | 117g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 3,750 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.3 s | 56.7 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 has 27 hp more than Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 1,578 kg 3,479 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 8.4 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 8.6 s |
Although Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 has more power, Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 1,550 km 963 mi |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 1,364 km 847 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,578 kg 3,479 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,550 km 963 mi | 1,364 km 847 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 104 g/km | 117 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.00 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,050 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
- Is 92 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 186 km (116 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























