AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 D3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk340 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions104 g/km
- Best estimated range1,550 km963 mi
- Best economy score96/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,486kg3,276lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 87.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.4s Calculated | 53.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 1,550km963mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,313mm170in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,785mm70in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,637mm104in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 340L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,180L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 128g/km | 104g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 3,750 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.4 s | 53.3 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 and AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 1,550 km 963 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 1,550 km 963 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 128 g/km | 104 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 7.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,050 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 96 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 450 km (280 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























